Translate

Showing posts with label attorney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attorney. Show all posts

Monday, March 17, 2014

Experience Counts

Most of the employees I see coming to this country for professional jobs for my client employers want to become Lawful Permanent Resident, and, eventually, U. S. Citizens.  It is their goal not only to work here, but also to “live the dream”.  One of the first questions I get when filing for their L or H status is: “When can I get my ‘green card’?” 

For non-immigrant workers, that path to a green card often begins with the PERM Process, or the Permanent Labor Certification Process.  This is a process that must be initiated by an employer for an employee, and often employees will make that a condition of their employment during their hiring process.  A benefit of this process is that it takes into account the derivatives listed on the non-immigrant petition when the employee came to work in the United States.  Therefore, within one process, a non-immigrant worker, his/her spouse, and their minor children can all get their “green cards” at once.  Another benefit of this process is that if the filing is done within a certain time period, non-immigrant workers in H-1B status can extend their stay past the normal expiration date for a non-immigrant worker in H-1B status.  This is particularly important for those workers from one of the countries that have a waiting period before the actual lawful permanent resident application (Form I-485) can be filed. 

One of the most important steps in this process is the proof that the beneficiary of this process is qualified for the job for which the recruitment was done and the Labor Certification was issued.  An important part of that proof is the experience letter, which is the best and most useful documentation of the experience of the employee to be sponsored.  An experience letter is a letter from your previous employer(s) showing not only that the applicant has experience, but also that the applicant has the relevant experience for the job being offered.   Unfortunately for the applicant, that experience shouldn’t come from their current employer, even at another location.

As we work with the employers to obtain lawful permanent resident status for one of their employees, we will assist in the preparation of the experience letter to be sent to a previous employer.  The reason for this is that experience letters are more than just a matter of detailing that an employee worked somewhere and the dates of that employment, but also what that employee did while there to show that the employee has the experience required for the position.  Experience letters need to be on the letterhead of the previous employer, contain the name and contact information for the person signing the letter, the title and relationship to the employee of the person signing the letter, the start and end date of the employee’s employment, the title of the employee while at that company, whether the position was full or part-time, and a brief job description of the duties performed by the employee while at the company.  The job description should contain duties and tasks which are relevant to the position that employee has, or will have, with the employer who is sponsoring that employee for their lawful permanent resident status.   All of these elements should be in the experience letter as proper evidence of the employee’s experience and/or training.  If any of these elements are missing or lacking, USCIS can, and most likely will, reject the letter and conclude that the petitioner has failed to prove that the employee has the required experience or training.

These experience letters must be from a person who has direct knowledge of the actual work the employee performed while working for the previous employer.  This also needs to be a person who directed that work, not just a co-worker.  The best person to provide that experience letter will be a manager that was directly over the employee or their supervisor, either of whom is still working for the previous employer.  Other alternatives are managers or supervisors further up in leadership chain of the company who have managerial or supervisory responsibilities over the former employee’s direct manager and/or supervisor and are still with the previous employer.  Finally, if there are no managers or supervisors that were there when the employee was at the previous employer, then the letter can be signed by someone in the human resources department to confirm the dates of hire and the job duties for the position the previous employee was in.

However, some of the employee’s previous employers may have been acquired by another company in a merger or buyout.  This can create problems, but, with enough forewarning, steps can be taken to get a previous manager or supervisor, who is with the new company, sign an experience letter while providing USCIS enough information regarding why the information is being provided by the a new company.  This will allow USCIS to determine that the information from this new company is actually the same as if it had come from the previous employer.  This process, however, takes more time and can delay the filing of the I-140 if not started early in the PERM Process.

Another problem is when the previous employer is no longer in business.  Sometimes, if an employee is aware of his employer’s financial difficulties and is concerned over that employer’s viability to continue to do business, it is advisable to have that employer write an experience letter, detailing all of the information above, very shortly after the employee obtains new employment so that the employee is not stuck without the very valuable experience letter if the company closes.  When a company dissolves, the records are often lost or destroyed and there is no way to obtain an experience letter from that previous employer.  However, all is not lost.  USCIS has allowed for former managers or supervisors who are with new companies to write experience letters on behalf of a former employer since it is impossible to obtain an experience letter from that previous employer.  The requirements of the experience letter do not change, but the wording has to address why the letter is not from the previous employer, but rather from a different company where the employee had no previous contact and detailing that the previous employer is no longer in business.


While experience letters are not needed until the I-140 petition filing stage, we get them as soon as possible in the PERM Process.  Experience letters allow us to confirm exact dates of employment for the Labor Certification Application; to verify experience needed for the job being recruited for to make sure that the employee has the required experience for the job; and to determine if additional steps are going to have to be taken to get the experience letter that is needed due to some of the scenarios discussed herein.  The experience letter relates to the entire PERM Process; and experience counts.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Fiancé and Marriage Based Immigration


There are many ways an individual may immigrate to America, but few clients are as driven as my K-1 fiancé(e) visa clients or my clients seeking a ‘green card’ for their new spouse. These two benefits, though different in many ways, are both available for Americans who have decided they want to spend their lives with someone from another country.

As our world becomes increasingly connected, international relationships seem to be more commonplace. This may be due to online dating sites, globalized markets, increased travel, and the ability to speak to a loved one overseas via webcam, or through chat rooms and instant messaging. Regardless of the reason, fiancé(e) visas and spousal immigrant visas are on the rise. Nearly 27,977 fiancé(e) visas were issued in 2012, up from approximately 7,783 in 1992. Likewise, nearly 273,429 spousal immigrant visas were issued in 2012, up from approximately 118,247 in 1992.[1]  
Even though thousands of these visas are issued annually, a substantial portion of petitions are also rejected. Some petitions are fraudulent and as such should be rejected, but others are simply not properly supported. Unfortunately, a denial can be an impossible hurdle and a heartbreaking end to an otherwise budding relationship. 

Knowing that approval is not a given, couples seeking fiancé(e)/spousal immigration benefits must tread carefully. Generally, hiring a competent immigration attorney will provide a couple with the best chance for success. However, couples who educate themselves so that they are better able to work with their attorney are even better positioned for success.

One of the first decisions couples will need to make is whether to file an I-130, Petition for Alien Relative to seek spousal benefits or to file an I-129F, Petition for Alien Fiancé(e). The decision is easy for individuals who are already legally married—they will typically file the I-130.[2]

A successful I-130 petition must show the “bona fide” nature of the marriage. This will include proof that both parties were able to legally marry, a valid marriage certificate, passport photos, a Form G-325 for each party (showing biographic data), and supporting evidence.[3]
If your spouse is overseas, they will need to go through a procedure called “consular processing” before entering the U.S., but will enter as a legal permanent resident (“green card” holder). If your spouse is already here, they will need to adjust status with Form I-485 to obtain their green card.

Couples who are not yet married may consider filing the I-129F, fiancé(e) visa petition (of course, they could choose to get married and pursue an I-130). The fiancé(e) visa is a 'non-immigrant' (or 'temporary') visa that permits the fiancé(e) to come to the U.S. for the purpose of getting married.

A successful petition requires the couple to show that they have met in person in the last two years and that they intend to get married within 90 days of the beneficiary’s arrival in the United States. Although this proof seems easier than an I-130 on its face, it is advisable to include similar elements of proof to a fiancé(e) visa petition as you would to an I-130 to ensure success.

After obtaining a fiancé Visa and getting married, the immigrant must adjust status by filing a Form I-485 to obtain legal permanent residency. Again, the couple should plan to show the bona fide nature of their marriage with the I-485 to ensure success.
If the couple has not been married for at least 2 years prior to receiving lawful permanent residency, they must file a Form I-751 to show the validity of their marriage after having been married two years. If they are not still together, the beneficiary must seek a waiver of the requirement to file a joint petition in order to remove the condition and become a permanent resident.

In the past, fiancé(e) visas were processed much more quickly than Form I-130 immigrant visa petitions, but now both petitions are processed in somewhat similar periods. Given this, the processing time does not offer a big advantage to choosing one over the other for most cases, but this is a decision you will need to make with your attorney based on many other factors that affect your individual decision.
Regardless of your choice, we wish you and your significant other all the best!




[2] It is possible for individuals who are already married to file a K-3 fiancé(e) petition for a non-immigrant visa. This option is not addressed in this post, but is similar to the K-1 fiancé(e) visa that is addressed, except the individuals applying for it are married at the time of filing.
 
[3] This evidence may include evidence of joint debts or assets (i.e. a mortgage or loan in both parties’ names, a joint lease, joint checking, savings, or credit accounts, both names on a title or deed) evidence of children born to the marriage (i.e. birth certificates), and other evidence such as joint membership to various clubs or organizations, evidence of traveling together, photographic evidence, affidavits from individuals familiar with both parties and their relationship, shared insurance policies, and a variety of other items that show that the couple intends to build a life together.
 

Friday, January 31, 2014

Immigration in the 21st Century

Welcome to the Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP Immigration Blog!

The Immigration Practice Group at Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP, (known informally as 'HSD Immigration') is pleased to offer this source of information, commentary and insight into immigration in the 21st Century.

The hot topic of immigration is not limited to foreign nationals - it affects everyone - and it is not just an American issue.  The reality of accessible transportation and advanced communication has facilitated the migration of people all over the globe.  And some nations are dealing with it better than others.

The tragedy of the deaths of more than 80 African immigrants after their boat capsized off the coast of Italy last October brought attention to the desperate plight of persons encountering danger while seeking to escape their own dangerous or hopeless situations.  Syrians fleeing violence end up straining the resources of Jordan and neighboring states as they seek safety in refugee camps while Eastern Europeans seeking economic opportunities in Western Europe often find hostile communities there.  Immigration is a global issue.  Finding ways to accommodate the new reality of global migration is one of the great challenges of the 21st Century.

In the U.S.,  we are facing the immediate challenge of navigating between securing the border against threats to our national security while providing opportunities to persons around the world who offer a diverse mix of cultures, gifts, knowledge and experience that give the United States its preeminent character.

You will not find this blog to be a political forum for debate on the issue of immigration reform.  The reason for this is simple: it is recognizing up front that one of the few things that both parties - and their constituents - universally agree upon is that the current immigration system is dysfunctional.  What we will do along the way is help readers come to a fuller understanding as to why it is dysfunctional and identify areas for change.  There is no need to align with one political identity or another to do this.

For example, in about 2 months, immigration practitioners around the country will scramble, sweat and steer their clients through the ridiculous annual rite of the 'H-1B Games'.

[For those who do not know, the 'H-1B visa' is a popular visa for foreign professionals working in a 'specialty occupation'.  There are approximately 65,000 that become available on October 1 of each year.  Since an H-1B visa petition cannot be filed more than 6 months in advance, the first day one may apply for an H-1B visa is April 1 of each year (this is no April Fool's joke).  Unfortunately, the demand for these visas is easily twice as much as the number of available visas.  So one April 1 of each year, the FedEx and UPS trucks line up outside of the USCIS Service Centers full of H-1B petitions that everyone in the country has filed at once.]

For the past several years, because there are not enough visas to fulfill the need, the 'H-1B Games' (like the 'Hunger Games') has devolved into a 'Lottery' at which time USCIS will randomly and arbitrarily choose which professionals will get the opportunity to have their Petitions examined for a visa.  Invariably, world renowned researchers, physician specialists and other valuable talent sit out for another year while others - some less deserving, others perhaps more deserving - get an opportunity for a visa simply by the whims of chance. 

These are important developments that affect the lives of individuals, their employers and companies that rely upon employees with these specialized skills and training to excel in today's global economy.

Existing immigration laws also affect families who arrive and stay in the U.S.  One of the fundamental principles of U.S. immigration laws has been 'family unity', but the haphazard federal and state legislation and inconsistent application of laws and regulations have left many families scattered and hopeless about the chances of reunification.

At Hunter, Smith & Davis, we encounter these and many other of the myriad of immigration circumstances that affect employers, employees and families striving to contribute to the American Dream.  We are therefore in a  unique vantage point to elucidate, comment and inform you on the latest developments and issues in immigration law.

We hope you will continue to join us as we navigate these challenges moving forward into the 21st Century.  Welcome.  

Bienvinedo.

Benvenuto
Willkommen
आपका स्वागत है
Welkom
Bienvenue

                                              -Your HSD Immigration Team-










TERMS OF USE, DISCLAIMER, LEGAL NOTICES, COMMENT POLICY, PRIVACY NOTICE AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS OF HUNTER, SMITH, & DAVIS, LLP*
(*Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP shall include all attorneys, paralegals, and staff acting in their capacity as such under the firm name)
No attorney-client privilege is provided on this blog and no representation is intended or implied by any content on this blog.  All content and comments are public.  While general legal advice is provided to the public, users are cautioned to seek professional legal advice from an attorney regarding their particular legal situation.  All content herein is used at the user’s risk. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.
All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only and is meant to assist members of the public in understanding various immigration concepts to assist them when they speak with their attorney.  All content provided on this blog may be, but are not required to be, edited, removed or updated as desired by the blog owner (Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP).  The owner of the blog reserves the right to change the focus on the blog, to shut it down, to sell it along with all content, or to change the terms of use at its own discretion.  The views expressed on this site and others are those of the author and not necessarily those of Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP.  The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or the applicability to a particular situation and is not obligated to update any post.  Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information.
The user assumes all responsibility for clicking on or otherwise following any link on this site.  Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP does not warrant, endorse, or otherwise make any representations regarding any link or advertisement, or the products or services used therein, on this site or blog.

Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP and the author are the legal copyright owners of all material on this site and blog and others may not use, reprint, or publish any work or portion of work herein without the written consent of the owner.  The owner is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this blog on other Web sites or media.

The owner of this blog reserves the right to, but is not required to, in its sole and absolute discretion, edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam; (ii) comments including profanity or containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive; (iii) comments that attack a person or entity individually; (iv) comments which are defamatory or libelous; (v) comments which contain the property of another without proper credit or permission; (vi) comments which are, by their very nature, inflammatory; (vii) comments from a person using the identity or username of another person; or (viii) comments which the owner feels are in its best interests to remove.  The owner of this blog reserves the right to suspend any new comments on any post or the entire website at any time.  The owner of this blog is not responsible for the content of any comment.  All comments on this blog may be used by the owner of this blog in any way which the owner deems desirable.  All rights to the comments are hereby abandoned by the commenter upon uploading said comment(s) to the blog and immediately become the property of the blog owner, if so desired.  Commenting on the blog is not legal representation and no representation is given on the accuracy, completeness or applicability of any comment on this blog, including those from the owner of the blog.
Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP does not sell any personal or contact information to third parties.  Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP is not responsible for the privacy practices of any of the advertisers, blog commenters, or companies whose links or contact information may be provided herein.  Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP is similarly not responsible for the actions or inaction of any advertiser, blog commenter, sponsor, or company whose link or contact information may be provided herein and no such mention in this blog of any third party shall serve as an endorsement of said third party.