Translate

Showing posts with label 'green card'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'green card'. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Terminating the H4 EAD?


Terminating the H4 EAD?


 
In February 2015, the Obama administration promulgated a federal regulation permitting certain spouses of foreign employees in H-1B visa status to seek authorization to work in the U.S.

Ordinarily, a spouse or child of a foreign employee in H-1B status is given a ‘derivative’ status known as ‘H-4’ status.  Under most circumstances, someone in H-4 status is not allowed to work in the U.S.   However, under this program, a spouse who is in H-4 status may apply for an Employment Authorization Document – (an ‘EAD’ or ‘work permit’) – if the H-1B spouse is also the beneficiary of an approved I-140 Petition for Alien Worker. 

The I-140 Petition For Alien Worker is the first step in the ‘green card’ process which shows that the foreign employee is eligible for a ‘green card’.  Because of the backlog of visa numbers for natives of some countries such as China and India, some foreign employees may have to wait years before they can take the second step of actually applying for a ‘green card’.  The executive order gave relief to the spouses of these foreign employees who successfully completed the first step while waiting for the second step.  It is typical for a foreign employee who qualifies for an H-1B visa to have a spouse who is also highly educated or skilled, so this program allowed spouses to put their education and skills to good use while waiting for a ‘green card’.

It was widely expected that when Donald Trump took office, he would attempt to eliminate this program.  Recent reports indicate that a proposed new federal regulation has been drafted that would do just that.

An added dimension to this story is the existence of a lawsuit styled Save Jobs USA v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security filed in April 2015 and presently at the D.C. Court of Appeals.  ‘Save Jobs USA’ is a consortium of technology workers who argue that the manner in which the H-4 EAD program was created was improper.  Proceedings in this case have been held in abeyance until December 31, 2017 to give time to the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security (under the new Trump administration) to assess the case.  A ruling may be coming as early as January, so this may be a factor in how/when/if the Trump Administration addresses this program.

In the meantime, foreign employees and their family members who may be eligible for the program should examine whether they are in a position to benefit from these regulations…sooner rather than later.

 

Your HS&D Immigration Team

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

On Second Thought... (changes to the October 2015 Visa Bulletin causes confusion)

Changes to the October 2015 Visa Bulletin causes confusion...

On September 9, 2015, the U.S. Dept. of State surprised lots of people by publishing its October Visa Bulletin with 2 different columns and dates used to determine when a visa applicant can apply for lawful permanent residency.

(See previous blog on the new process for determining filing dates for lawful permanent residency.  In a nutshell, the new process allows applicants to file their applications prior to the actual 'Priority Date' being current.)

A mere 16 days later, it issued a mea culpa in the form of a new revised October 2015 Visa Bulletin with revised filing dates.  Evidently, erroneous information was used to determine the appropriate 'filing dates' for certain immigrant visa preference categories.

As a consequence, the October Visa Bulletin published on September 25, 2015 reflected revised filing dates - particularly for the EB-2 China and India categories - that were not nearly as generous as the original Visa Bulletin published on September 9.  (The EB-2 category for China moved backwards nearly 1 year; the EB-2 category for India moved backwards 2 years.  The EB-3 category for the Philippines moved backwards 5 years.)

Unfortunately, for prospective immigrants who were excitedly preparing their immigrant visa applications, the amended filing dates proved to be a huge letdown.  A lawsuit - Mehta v. DOS, in the Western District of Washington - sought class-action status to compel the U.S. Dept. of State to accept applications filed pursuant to the original October Visa Bulletin published on September 9, 2015. A motion for a Temporary Restraining Order ('TRO') - in effect restraining the implementation of the revised October 2015 Visa Bulletin - was denied, and the case is still pending.

Since then, the November 2015 Visa Bulletin has been published - with very little movement in those categories; and the December 2015 Visa Bulletin should be published in the next week or so -

for now... the wait continues...